The Digital Orchard

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    This would be a great idea.

  2. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Agreed on this one. Creative naming can get around this, but there's room for longer names, so I don't see any reason why this can't be tweaked to make use of that extra room.

    (Doesn't appear to have changed since this idea was last updated in March)

  3. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Agreed

    (can't vote since I'm out of votes)

  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Sub-groups are supported, unless you wanted even deeper groups beyond the two levels supported now?

  5. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    The Trash Can can be listed in the dropdown menu where the groups are and the "Oldest First" option.

    (Ultimately, I'd like to see this dropdown menu become a bit more enhanced visually and functionally, but that's a separate suggestion)

  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Brian, to answer for Scott, yes that would be the same idea. Please combine these.

  7. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Not only websites, but other URLs, too. For example, we log into our servers via HTTPS or SSH, so having both URLs available would be very handy for us.

    Labeling each would be very handy, too, even if that label was generated automatically from the protocol.

    Example:

    WEB - https://site.com/login
    SSH - ssh://username@site.com

  8. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    I would add to this that any fields expecting an email address should ideally use [type="email"] to get the most optimal keyboard displayed on mobile devices.

    The Digital Orchard supported this idea  · 
  9. 60 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    @Brian,

    You stated that: "A user's master password is their key to decrypting passwords, so we can't swap that out without re-encrypting data for them."

    But that doesn't make entire sense. If I, as one user, adds a record to TeamPassword, then my tech person logs in with his password, he has access to that record, as well. But how does he have access if my own password was used to encrypt the data?

    Something isn't jiving with your explanation and team access to the stored data.

    Does your system lookup the "owner" of the record being accessed and uses their password to decrypt that record? What if that person is removed from the system, then the key is lost as well. So I doubt that's how your system works. Please clarify.

    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Yes, I have a team member who has forgotten his password. #stuck

    The Digital Orchard supported this idea  · 
  10. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Yes, API access to TeamPassword would be absolutely outstanding!

    The Digital Orchard supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    The Digital Orchard commented  · 

    Confirmed in a fresh browsing session in a second browser that had not yet been used with TeamPassword.

    1) Cleared all cookies.
    2) Logged into TeamPassword.
    3) Was prompted for 2FA code. Entered it.
    4) Checked "Remember This Device".

    I actually logged in twice, first time not checking the option to Remember This Device. The same 11 cookies existed both times, so a separate cookie is not being used for that option. Likely, it's part of my account's settings, but no option is being exposed to undo that setting. Now I have two separate browsers (Safari and Chrome) that are not prompting me for 2FA no matter what I do. Can you elaborate on how this feature works?

    The Digital Orchard shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base